From [email protected] Sat Mar 25 20:09:32 EST 1995
Article: 53069 of alt.sex.movies
Path: roch0.eznet.net!news.sprintlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!EU.net!sun4nl!news.rotterdam.luna.net!news
From: [email protected] (Peter van Aarle)
Newsgroups: alt.sex.movies
Subject: Review: Demolition Woman 2
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 1995 23:51:05 +0100
Organization: Luna Internet Services
Lines: 84
Distribution: world
Message-ID:
NNTP-Posting-Host: vinyl.bart.nl
X-Newsreader: NewsHopper
Status: RO
Seems some movies are getting over the big pond quicker than they used to.
This just means a better change that movies I see haven't been reviewed to
death yet ;-)
Well, here's one I just saw:
Demolition Woman 2 (In-X-cess 1994, dir: Phil M. Noir)
cast: Victoria Andrews, Bunnie Bleu, Tricia Yen, Rebecca Wild, Tammi Ann
Jonathon Morgan, Alex Sanders and Toni Tedeschi.
[Note for our Dutch readers: this is a Men Only video, and nowhere on the
box does it indicate this is part 2. It appears to be part 1, in fact the
cast list on the box includes Isis Nile, but she is NOT in this part, only
in part 1.]
The movie starts with a text explaining the action in part 1 (necessary for
this is a continuation of the story):
"2014: as a result of radiation from the ozone layer <<>>, all
men have been rendered impotent. In a desperate attempt to save mankind,
the top scientists have recruited Demolition Woman, giving her a Sexual
Time Space Transporter to bring back two virile studs from the past. One of
the primal men broke contact and became lost in the Time Space
Continuum..."
Then during the credits we get some snippets of sex action from part 1
(looks more interesting then part 2 was, I think...)
So, on to the story: Dr. Bunnie Bleu and dr. Tricia Yen use some sort
device to transfuse sexual energy from primal nerd Jonathan Morgan (who
once again plays a braindead moron or nerd. What is this, typecasting????)
to Toni Tedeschi. Obviously the treatment works because as soon as dr.
Bunnie and nurse Tammi Ann lead Jonathon away the only thing on Toni's mind
is screwing Tricia Yen. And the proof is conclusive: the treatment has
definitely cured his impotence (although I would have expected more than a
few drops of cum after a life time of abstinence ;-)
Meanwhile Sandra Nixon (Rebecca Wild) uses her transporter to get lost
primal surfer-dude Alex Sanders out of the presidents bedroom (don't ask,
that was part 1 ;-) to her own bedroom. She immediately makes it obvious
what she has in mind for him as she starts stripping out of her silver
suit. Despite being to stupid to put on his pants (as he proves later) Alex
catches on quickly enough and tries to give her what she so desperately
needs: a good screw. This is quite a good scene, with some unconventional
positions. Sandra Nixon also seems to have been thirsty, as she eagerly
awaits his nectar.
In the lab a replacement Demolition Woman Victoria Andrews (Isis played
this in part 1, but they explain this with a strike by the Demolition
Women's Union) is called in to help find the lost primal dude. So she and
Jonathon get back into the Sexual Time Space Transporter (a black sports
car) to try and locate Alex. On their way Victoria wants to know if the
transfusion has drained all of his sexual powers. Luckily this is not the
case, so Victoria can get a taste of good old fashioned fucking herself.
They arrive at Rebecca's place and after a touching reunion of the two
buddies they decide to try and find some brews to celebrate, leaving the
girls alone together. Well, what else is there to do for two girls in a
porn movie then "getting better acquainted" ? I don't know, and apparently
neither do they, since that is exactly what they do :-)
And back in the lab dr. Bunnie Bleu and nurse Tammi Ann are examining Toni
Tedeschi. Being dedicated scientists they decide to see if his new found
potency is still there. They are very glad that it is, and take full
advantage of his hard-on.
The movie wraps up with Demolition Woman Victoria bringing our two heros
back to their apartment.
So what's the verdict on this movie, you ask?
Ah, well, see... I'd say that the sex is quite adequate: nothing very
special, but not at all bad.
The story is a cute idea (though not 100% original) but the execution ain't
perfect (so what else is new in porn).
On that Imperial scale I'd say it's about a 2.00
--
,,,
(o o) "Ehh, seen any _good_ porn lately ?"
---------------oOO--(_)--OOo------------------------------------------
Peter van Aarle ([email protected] / [email protected])