From [email protected] Sat Oct 7 15:05:51 EDT 1995 Article: 79005 of alt.sex.movies Path: news.eznet.net!news.sprintlink.net!simtel!news3.noc.netcom.net!ix.netcom.com!netnews From: [email protected] (JGrouch) Newsgroups: alt.sex.movies Subject: Review: Cum for Dinner, chit chat about money shots Date: 7 Oct 1995 15:43:24 GMT Organization: Asylum Associates Lines: 157 Message-ID: <[email protected]> NNTP-Posting-Host: ix-col2-20.ix.netcom.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=US-ASCII X-NETCOM-Date: Sat Oct 07 8:43:24 AM PDT 1995 X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.99.6 Status: RO A few notes on the money shot... I once walked in on a conversation with a couple of acquaintences that revolved around who would do what if they were in a porno movie. The subject slowly degraded to some of the "dumber" things in porno movies like all the weird noises they make, is his dick really that big, etc.. Then we concocted our own porno scene based on present company, detailing all the dialog and insertation. Eventually someone said "pull it out because you gotta see the guy cum." "Why do they do that anyway, isn't the chick they are fucking good enough? How come the always gotta put it in their right hand before they cum?" "I dunno but we gotta see it." As far as I am concerned there are only a few instances where I actually want to see the money shot. The most obvious instance would be the facial, but decent cases could be made for cum on lucious breasts or a gob of goo sliding down the crack of the ass starting from the anus and travelling down over the vagina creating an artsy water-fall effect. Squirts on the feet, hands or on a shaved or partially bald vagina are acceptible and could be used as flavoring so the dedicated viewer doesn't get desensitized and bored (i.e. wow, another massive facial what will they think of next). Sperm deposits on the tummy rank very close to the bottom of list of useless places for ol'spunky. Maybe if the woman was extremely cute (not sluttly looking, just a innocent kind of cute with nice eyes) and rubbed the juice into her tummy while looking at the guy, it could be considered worthy. By far though, the most worthless money shot target in on the back or on the ass-cheeks. The only justification for a jizz-covered back would be a followup with a man or a woman sensually rubbing it in. Unfortunately, after most money shots, the spoim just lies there like useless fish entrails until the scene fades. Another important point: If the money shot is going to be visible, put something worth the money out there. There is nothing more frustrating than watching a guy aim for one of the prime targets, feign a stroke or some sort of heart failure, then deliver a load that so small you have to pause or actually pay attention to make sure it happened. Further aggravating the matter, most money shots of this type are usually followed by a guy shaking the remains of a huge load he had been saving for weeks onto some woman's back. Why? The director of the movie should ensure fully loaded guys get the prime real estate and actually get a visible money shot. If the gent doesn't have the spent, don't bother with a money shot. End the scene with a sexy kiss and a smile (or a fade to some inanimate object). Would following this simple rule make all of us happy? The Review: Blue Coral Productions presents Rodney Moore's Cum for Dinner. Starring: Natasha, Kimberly Cummings, Nadia Nyce, Lynx Dyan, Luna Parks, Samantha, Dusty, Vladmir, and the "king of cream" Rodney Moore. There are a couple of things can that make a Rodney Moore movie pretty good. Most of you that have seen his movies would probably say "the massive facial cumshots!" but I think you might be wrong: Have you ever noticed that RM's movies almost always have women that give really good head? You might not have thought about that because most of us are used to the over-produced, hands-on, sex-starved slut slobbering over your bone blow-jobs that are part of the typical step 1-2-3-bang-next chick porn flick. . The choreographed knob polishings usually feature phone-sex dialog like "is this what you want" and "want me to suck your fat, hard cock now." Duh, that's why the dick in dangling in front of your lips. Should the guy say "no baby, just look at it real pretty like." or something? In Rodney movies, there is a lot of no-hands method going on and the scenes make you think "you know, I really wish that mas my dick right now.." Thats a good blow-job. Secondly, all the women in Rodney movie seem to really enjoy the sex. Some people have publicly hacked on some of them for not being as attactive as some of the other porn starlets and that's too bad. There are more than a few gorgeous women in porn that look real good but look un-interested on film, will not do an occasional anal or facial or other special act, must be directed on how to turn people on, and generally create just enough heat to generate income for themselves. Each Rodney movie captures a lot of the honesty that many amateur films provide, letting the viewer get into the mood with the on-screen participants. The only problem with viewing people actually having sex instead of acting is that real sex is a little too repetitive and ends up dragging on. In "Cum for Dinner" some of the fuck scenes are long genital grinding shots or extended 3rd person shots of two people banging away. They simply lack creativity. The lack of background music removes a lot of continuity from the film and if the actors/actresses aren't turning you on, chances are you are adding wear and tear to your fast forward button. Only the scene with Samantha, short as it was, had the right amount of sex before going to the next view, and I kinda liked it. Short, sweet and you knew that the two probably had some good sex together. The movie starts with the best scene. Natasha could easily pass for a 14 or 15 year old with her puppy dog eyes and diminuative body (oops did I say that, prank caller, prank caller). She starts the scene making sculptures out of rubber dildos before lured onto her knees for some great first-person shots of her giving head! Rodney baits her with his dong as Natasha follows him around on her hands and knees trying to nibble on his dick like a bass chasing a lure. Then there are the facials... Two down right messy ones this time. The two massive facials involve Nadia and Samantha. Nadia is an adorable, middle-eastern looking woman who would have looked downright fantastic giving head if Rodney would have slipped her more than a second or two's worth of schlong (actually there is a brief instance where she is carrying a rubber dildo in her mouth that made me go Wow). She took a huge creamy load like a champ, obeying all "Jgrouch's Laws of Facials", and taking a whopping dallop right on the eye-lid. While Rodney is dropping his loads, Kim Cummings starts lapping the stuff off Nadia's face like a Saint Bernard, sky-rocketing the pervert-meter to new heights. The 2nd facial features Samantha, is a weirdly attactive blonde with a great body. Her skit was very brief but I loved how it was filmed, fading between scenes of the two having sex and moments leading up to the facial blast. Rodney leaves a pile of spunk all over her mouth and down her left cheek. After the money-shot, Rodney leads her into the bathroom to look at the mess on her face before she cleans it off. Samantha's face, attractive as it is, glazed like a donut, looking into a mirror, was a real turn-on. Notice should also go to Lynx Dyan who fucked enthusiastically and looks like a natural for facial money shots but her hubby had to empty out his change pocket to muster one. Luna and Dusty's scenes were too brief but Dusty has a really cute face and Luna eats cum-covered berries out of dish (with instant replay from a 2nd camera angle for some really strange reason).. Rating: 3.00 for money shot fans, 2.75 for people not interested in facials, fanatical facial lovers who insist that every facial is a monster 2.00 for people looking specifically for cum eating (despite the title there was more wearing then gobbling) Raincoat Round-up: Facials, two massive facials, facial with eye-shot, dog-like cum lapping off face, dildo sculptures, hair pulling, spitting on butt-crack, cum on berries followed by gobbling, cute-blonde staring at cum glazed face in mirror, girl-girl action, dildo usage, one anal entry, small dildo in anus. Database stuff: Natasha, average facial Nadia Nyce, massive facial (deserving of Homer Simpson woo-hoo) Lynx Dyan, w-a facial (wasn't her fault) Samantha, massive facial Dusty, g-a facial As always, opinions are my own, standard disclaimer,, yada yada yada. BTW. Is there a FAQ or some sort of guide for Imperial rating system? I've always been taking off for misspelled subtitles and woman who pronounce cum like the word "comb".... :)