Article: 90193 of alt.sex.movies
Path: news.io.com!news.tamu.edu!newshost.comco.com!news.texas.net!news.sprintlink.net!news.eznet.net!shell1.eznet.net!not-for-mail
From: Heretic
Newsgroups: alt.sex.movies
Subject: Heretic reviews: Ona Zee's Dollhouse 2 (g/g)
Date: 3 Jan 1996 16:33:03 -0500
Organization: E-Znet
Lines: 66
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
NNTP-Posting-Host: shell1.eznet.net
Status: RO

Here's the latest from Heretic.

"Only in Washington [D.C.] can an 8% increase be considered a 2% cut."
----------------------------------------------------
It's been quite some time since I've taken up the keyboard to write a review. 
There are any number of reasons for this, including all the standard ones, but
the one that stands out is the lack of anything good to rent.  For me, it's
come down to John Stagliano + John Leslie, and then everyone else.  I'll go
into my praise for these two another time in order to review the following
film:

Ona Zee's Dollhouse 2.  Rachel Love, Lovette, Kirsty Waay, Shonna Lynn, Winter
Lane, Kristy Lynn, and 4 other women who's names I forgot.

This film is an example of why 90% of my rentals are from Evil Angel + related
companies.  The first Dollhouse was very good-the best all-girl video seen in
quite a while.  It has a successful formula: pretty pornstars dressed in
schoolgirl-type clothes, going over to Ona's and then their playing with each
other.  Frans has already written a review of it, so see that for further
details.

The vid starts with the same elements, but adds disturbing fake tits, poor
camera work to the mix.  First scene with Rachel + Lovette starts of as usual,
but Lovette has really bad looking tits.  UGH!  I like Rachel, despite the
fact that I'm probably in the minority on that.  The next problem comes when we
got to the insertion shots (dildoes, etc.)  It's very close up work, and there
is an extremely heavy spotlight on, washing out highlights and creating lots of
shadows.  All girls pretty much look the same at the POV, what the point?  Both
girls get toys in both holes (at the same time).

Next is Winter Lane in a solo scene, a la Jen Teal's from the original.  Winter
is quite pretty, but I suspected implants a la Tera Hart, despite her large
areaolas.  This was confirmed later in the scene with scars.  Her implants are
smaller versions on Tera's, so if you've seen her's, you know what these look
like.  Bring back silicone, I say (I'll get to that issue at another time).
I just couldn't get over the implants, so the Jen Teal scene was infinitely
better.

Next are Shonna and Kirsty.  It looks like this was shot for another of Ona's
films, and then just stuck in here to give the movie a reasonable length, as
the scene begins with the girls in a pool, and no Ona. In a 4 b/g + 1 g/g movie,
this would be the average g/g, which means it's pretty bad in an all-girler.
Still, both girls are natural, and do pay attention to each others nipples. 
That's the only good things I can say about this.  Kirsty in a blonde here,
and my distaste for blondes increases more each day.
 
Now it's back to the old setup, 2 girls and Ona, one with horrible fake tits,
a la Summer Cummings.  UGH!  I FF'ed through it.  More spotlight close ups.
 
The finale to this film is a threeway with Kristy and 2 other girls, sans Ona.
Again, probably shot for another movie.  The is a little better, with some full
body shots, but again, with closeups-what's the difference from one girl
performing cunilingus one another at this POV?  I FF'ed through most of this
scene as well.  One girl (no Kristy), get a small dildo up her ass.

Watching the credits, I noticed that 4 names were listed under Cameraman, so
this confirms my suspicion that some of the scene were shot for other films and
pasted in here.  Amoung the the names is the great Jack Remy, but I was unable
to tell where his work was.  Besides, what's going on on the other side of the
camera is pretty important, and the cameraman can't do much about it if it
sucks.

Rating: 1 out of 10.  Leave this one on the shelves.
Isn't it better to feel good than do good?